Built to Mislead. Cyber Deception Turns Attackers into Intelligence Assets

Built to Mislead. Cyber Deception Turns Attackers into Intelligence Assets

“All warfare is based on deception,” wrote Sun Tzu over two millennia ago. That same principle now underpins a modern cybersecurity shift where defenders use deception to turn intrusions into intelligence, and attackers into unwitting informants.

 

Authored by : Kwek Ming Hong, DevOps Lead, Consulting, Ensign InfoSecurity

 

In the shifting landscape of cyber threats, attackers no longer announce their presence. They move silently, impersonating users, mimicking system behaviour, and probing digital environments with precision. The intrusions are quiet, the methods evolving, and the margin for error growing thinner by the day.

 

Organisations have poured resources into endpoint protection, behavioural analytics, and zero trust architecture. These remain critical. Yet, breaches persist, not because of inadequate investment, but because attackers understand the terrain too well. They know what defenders expect to see, and they stay within those lines.

 

This is where digital deception becomes a deliberate tactic. Drawing from principles as old as warfare itself, most notably Sun Tzu’s assertion that “All warfare is based on deception”, it changes the conditions of engagement. It shifts cyber defence from passively monitoring systems to actively shaping the environment in which adversaries operate.

 

Sun Tzu wrote, “If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.” In today’s terms, this translates into luring attackers into carefully crafted decoys, systems designed to resemble outdated servers, unused credentials, or confidential documents. These are not mistakes. They are intentional constructs, placed to trigger high-confidence alerts the moment they are touched.

 

The purpose of these systems is not limited to detection; they also serve as intelligence-gathering tools. Every interaction within a decoy reveals the attacker’s tools, behaviours, and intent. It becomes possible to observe their decision-making, learn their objectives, and trace their movements, all without them reaching actual business assets.

 

Unlike traditional defences that rely on detecting known patterns, deception creates opportunities to uncover the unknown. It exposes new techniques and identifies persistent threats operating under the radar. This is especially relevant for insider risks or credential misuse, where the line between legitimate and malicious activity can blur.

 

The use of deception has become more sophisticated in recent years. Artificial intelligence now supports the generation of context-aware decoys that adapt in real time, offering a dynamic and credible environment that reacts to the attacker’s behaviour.

 

Leveraging Generative AI and agentic workflows, signals and telemetry from adversarial activities can be fed back into an intelligent orchestration platform.  This platform makes use of lightweight MCP (Model Context Protocol) agents deployed across endpoints and network assets. These MCP agents can dynamically reconfigure the deception environment to generate context-aware realism for further isolation and analysis of adversarial activities.

 

Increasingly, these capabilities are being delivered through Deception-as-a-Service (DaaS), a managed offering that allows organisations to deploy deception at scale across cloud and hybrid environments without heavy in-house engineering. DaaS enables organisations to operationalise deception quickly and efficiently, aligning with existing infrastructure while maintaining continuous tuning based on live threat activity. DaaS offerings allow the organisations to tap into the collective expertise of service providers in adversarial simulation, threat hunting and cyber threat intelligence to formulate deception scenarios that will deliver the most value.

 

Importantly, deception does not replace other defences. It complements detection engines and access controls, acting as an additional layer of visibility, one that is triggered only by deliberate or suspicious interaction. In doing so, it reduces false positives and enhances clarity for response teams already strained by alert volume.

 

From a governance perspective, the benefits extend beyond threat detection. Deception technologies offer demonstrable proof of proactive control, a valuable asset when reporting to boards or regulators. It signals readiness and awareness, especially in the context of evolving compliance expectations around resilience and incident reporting.

 

In environments involving sensitive information or essential services, deception adds critical value. In a more complex environment that is layered with traps, attackers have to move more slowly and conduct additional reconnaissance to distinguish the crown jewels from deception assets. In doing so, they are more likely to be discovered, giving defenders more time and opportunities to detect and respond to threats.

 

Ultimately, deception reflects a broader shift in cybersecurity mindset: from reacting to threats to anticipating them. It assumes that breaches will happen and instead focuses on how organisations can gain ground even in the midst of compromise. That shift in posture, from passive defence to active engagement, is where meaningful resilience begins.

 

In The Art of War, Sun Tzu observed that “Supreme excellence consists of breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting.” In cyber terms, that means gathering intelligence, controlling the narrative, and forcing adversaries to reveal themselves, on terms you have set.

 

This is no longer a theoretical concept. Deception capabilities are already in use today. With managed solutions such as DaaS, even the most complex enterprises can operationalise deception as a controllable and effective layer within their broader cybersecurity strategy.

 

For CISOs, CTOs and security architects, deception offers a strategic way forward, one that recognises the inevitability of breaches, but is designed to ensure that organisations are not caught off guard. Whether embedded in an existing architecture or delivered through DaaS, the principle remains the same: it is no longer enough to understand your environment; defenders must now shape the environment in which the attackers operate.

 

-End-

 

The article has been published in Cybersec Asia. Read more here.